Posts Tagged telescope
NASA Gets WISE, Hunts for Evidence of Nemesis
Posted by mistergroonk in Science on April 19, 2010
Do you know what Nemesis means?
If you follow Brick Top’s definition it’s “a righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent.” For some scientists it is “The Death Star.” A proposed undetectable object on the edge of our solar system that hurls comets at Earth every 26 million years. This cycle syncs with the mass extinctions currently documented by scientists.
If true, this Nemesis would qualify as a “horrible ‘see you next Tuesday'”.
This theory is not the only theory going around, of course. NASA’s newest telescope WISE(Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer ) looks to answer the nemesis question once and for all.
Richard Muller of the University of California Berkeley first suggested the Nemesis theory, and even wrote a popular science book on the topic. He thinks Nemesis is a red dwarf star 1.5 light years away. Many scientists counter that such a wide orbit is inherently unstable and could not have lasted long – certainly not long enough to have caused the extinctions seen in Earth’s fossil record. But Muller says this instability has resulted in an orbit that has changed greatly over billions of years, and in the next billion years Nemesis will be thrown free of the solar system.
Binary star systems are common in the galaxy. It is estimated that one-third of the stars in the Milky Way are either binary or part of a multiple-star system.
When will we know the answer?
We may not have an answer to the Nemesis question until mid-2013. WISE needs to scan the sky twice in order to generate the time-lapsed images astronomers use to detect objects in the outer solar system. The change in location of an object between the time of the first scan and the second tells astronomers about the object’s location and orbit. Then comes the long task of analyzing the data.
“I don’t suspect we’ll have completed the search for candidate objects until mid-2012, and then we may need up to a year of time to complete telescopic follow-up of those objects,†said Kirkpatrick.
Two to three years? Putting the year 2012 aside. We’re guessing that’s enough time between the millions of years cycle.
NASA’s Going a Bit Moon Crazy
Posted by mistergroonk in Admin, Space, Technology, The Future on July 10, 2008
Roughly 40 years after they actually landed on the thing but who am I to judge?
Fuck that, I judge all the time. That’s not important now.
First off, the Moon-scope:
In the Moon’s weak gravity, it might be possible to build a telescope with a mirror as large as 50 meters across, half the length of a football field—big enough to analyze the chemistry on planets around other stars for signs of life.
That’s the dream of Peter C. Chen, astrophysicist at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. And he wants to build it using lunar dust—because that might just be the most economical approach.
“If we lift all materials from Earth, we’re limited by what a rocket can carry to the Moon,” Chen explains. “But on the Moon, you’re absolutely surrounded by lunar dust”—a prized natural resource in the eyes of Chen, an expert in composite materials.
next up, Water on the Moon:
A new analysis of Apollo 15 moon rocks has for the first time uncovered water locked up inside.
It’s just a miniscule amount of the wet stuff — not enough to sustain even a lunar cactus or to power any hydrogen jetpacks — but the discovery does bolster hopes that there has always been water in moon rocks and perhaps some locked away as ice in the dark crannies of polar craters.
The discovery also overturns 40 years of studies which had failed to find the water and which led to the conclusion, drawn by most planetary scientists, that moon rocks must be all dry.
[…]
One of the ramifications of the newfound water is that it calls into question some of the details about the way the moon formed. The most popular current theory is that a Mars-sized body sideswiped Earth about 4.5 billion years ago, creating a ring of debris that eventually coalesced into the moon.
(via science@nasa, discovery news )




