{"id":487,"date":"2003-06-24T19:43:55","date_gmt":"2003-06-24T19:43:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/groonk.net\/blog\/?p=487"},"modified":"2013-03-02T05:56:25","modified_gmt":"2013-03-02T11:56:25","slug":"the-playboy-economy-link","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.groonk.net\/blog\/2003\/06\/the-playboy-economy-link\/","title":{"rendered":"The Playboy Economy Link"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p>NEW YORK (Reuters Health) &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/story.news.yahoo.com\/news?tmpl=story&#038;cid=571&#038;ncid=751&#038;e=2&#038;u=\/nm\/20030624\/hl_nm\/playboy_curves_dc\" target=\"blank\" class=\"external external_icon\">&#8220;Boom or bust&#8221; may take on new meaning as researchers theorize a link between U.S. economic conditions and subtle changes in Playboy centerfold physiques.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>According to researchers, a comparison of the faces and figures of Playmates of the Year from 1960 to 2000 suggests men may prefer stronger-looking women in hard times, and softer, more vulnerable types when bull markets resume.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In short, we want someone to have fun with when times are good, and we want someone to take care of us &#8212; and themselves &#8212; when times are bad,&#8221; said psychology researcher Dr. Terry F. Pettijohn II, of Mercyhurst College in Erie, Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n<p>Previous research has suggested that ideals of beauty and sexual attractiveness change between cultures and over time. A handful of studies have discerned a slight trend toward thinner bodies among both Playmates and Miss America  contestants over the past few decades.<\/p>\n<p>Comparing models over the years, the researchers discovered that, in hard times, Playmates tended to be slightly older, heavier and taller, with larger waists and bigger waist-to-hip ratios. Smaller eyes &#8212; a feature linked to &#8220;stronger&#8221; faces &#8212; were also predominant.<\/p>\n<p>As an example, Anna Nicole Smith, the fullest-figured Playmate of the Year ever &#8212; graced Playboy&#8217;s pages in 1993, which Pettijohn called one of the &#8220;worst&#8221; years on record in terms of economic and social factors.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, during more affluent periods the average Playboy subscriber&#8217;s fancy appeared to turn to softer, more girlish types. Playmates of the Year during &#8220;good times&#8221; tended to be younger, shorter, thinner models, with smaller waists and bigger eyes.<\/p>\n<p>But since Playboy publisher Hugh Hefner has always chosen the Playmate of the Year, might trends in Playmate measurements simply reflect changes in &#8216;Hef&#8217;s personal tastes?<\/p>\n<p>Pettijohn is doubtful.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Playboy regularly asks for reader input on the issue, including submitting letters, mailing voting cards, calling a hotline, or voting online,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We assume that Mr. Hefner takes public opinion into consideration.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW YORK (Reuters Health) &#8211; &#8220;Boom or bust&#8221; may take on new meaning as researchers theorize a link between U.S. economic conditions and subtle changes in Playboy centerfold physiques. According to researchers, a comparison of the faces and figures of Playmates of the Year from 1960 to 2000 suggests men may prefer stronger-looking women in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[12],"class_list":["post-487","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-sex"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.groonk.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.groonk.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.groonk.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.groonk.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.groonk.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=487"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.groonk.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18121,"href":"https:\/\/www.groonk.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487\/revisions\/18121"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.groonk.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.groonk.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.groonk.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}